Quantcast
Channel: CarsGuide - Sports cars
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 694

Ford Mustang EcoBoost 2017 review

$
0
0

Ford Mustang EcoBoost 2017 review

13 September 2017
 by 
  • Price N/A

What we like

  • Sensational looks
  • Automotive history in the metal
  • Four-cylinder car looks almost identical to V8

What we don't

  • Could be throatier
  • Rear seats aren't useful
  • Safety dramas blunt appeal

Ford Mustang. The name just rolls off the tongue, doesn’t it? It’s one of the most evocative and best-known models in the automotive kingdom, and the decision to sell it properly in Australia – after a couple of false starts – has proven to be a boon for Ford Australia. And after a whirlwind 18 months of sales, Ford can finally catch its breath and actually provide dealers with stock that isn’t pre-sold.

The V8-powered GT has been by far the biggest seller, but the four-cylinder EcoBoost version we’re testing here has its own merits – not least of which being that it looks almost identical to its bigger-engined brother.

Is a four-cylinder, turbocharged Mustang a sacrilege, though? Or can it show the V8 a thing or two?

Allianz2min Insurance QuotePricing & Specs

Verdict 

The EcoBoost is the thinking-man’s Mustang. For all intents and purposes, it looks identical to the more expensive GT, and it gives nothing away to its burlier brother in real-world driving.

And if you dropped a couple of grand of those savings on judicious suspension tuning, the Mustang EcoBoost – already pretty handy in the corners – will leave the GT in its wake on the right road.

However, the issues surrounding the Mustang’s safety must be factored in if you’re considering using the rear seats. Even acknowledging that the V8 was the car test by the safety bodies, body construction, seat arrangement and safety aid fitment don’t vary between the two cars, and it’s a very poor score for a modern car.

Safety status aside, would you go for a turbo Mustang over a V8 version?

Ford Mustang EcoBoost 2017 review

What we like

  • Sensational looks
  • Automotive history in the metal
  • Four-cylinder car looks almost identical to V8

What we don't

  • Could be throatier
  • Rear seats aren't useful
  • Safety dramas blunt appeal

Comments

'); }

Sponsored 

0

Vehicles 

FORD, MUSTANG, 2017, COUPE, FASTBACK 2.3 GTDi, FM MY17, (V0H17A)

Range Module 

FORD, MUSTANG, 2017, COUPE, FASTBACK 2.3 GTDi, FM MY17, (V0I17A)
FORD, MUSTANG, 2017, COUPE, FASTBACK 2.3 GTDi, FM MY17, (V0H17A)
FORD, MUSTANG, 2017, CONVERTIBLE, 2.3 GTDi, FM MY17, (V0G17A)
FORD, MUSTANG, 2017, COUPE, FASTBACK GT 5.0 V8, FM MY17, (V0L17A)
FORD, MUSTANG, 2017, COUPE, FASTBACK GT 5.0 V8, FM MY17, (V0J17A)
FORD, MUSTANG, 2017, CONVERTIBLE, GT 5.0 V8, FM MY17, (V0K17A)

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 694

Trending Articles